Ok talked about price of eggs in china, horse feathes and buffolow wings, among other things. So lets discuss atomic energy. I think it would be a fesable solution for the enenergy crisis. What do you think?

@Reinmaker56: Too dangerous... We have more than enough to destroy ourselves, many times over.

@Zilya777: no im talking bout atomic energy not nuculear. Think they forgot about it when they got nuclear energy.

Well were not sure how nuclear fusion would workbas an energy source but ive it might be less dangerous (since fission is what we use in warheads)

@Nenavar: right but when einstein split the atom think it should have been explored as a energy source. But military developed weapons in stead the atomic bomb. Then went to nuclear. Leaving atomic.

@Reinmaker56: it could still be but they wont because it would cost alot of money and wind, hydro, and solar energies are still usable even when other fuels run out

@Nenavar: yeah really its basically more about the money than energy crisis i think so too. Atomic would be reliable though and constent where the others depend on sunshine water flow and wind.

umm do you realize that atomic energy is nuclear energy?

@BoxBlockingBitch: really?

@BoxBlockingBitch: what is the difference between atomic bomb and nuclear bomb?